Independent reviews of automated data classification tools. You can't protect what you can't find — we evaluate the software that discovers, labels, and classifies sensitive data across your entire organisation.
Only three classification vendors are featured. Each is independently assessed across discovery accuracy, labelling automation, DLP integration depth, and regulatory support.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection provides automated data classification and sensitivity labelling deeply integrated with Microsoft 365. The platform uses trainable classifiers and exact data match to identify sensitive information across Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and endpoints, applying persistent sensitivity labels that travel with the document. For organisations built on Microsoft infrastructure, Purview's classification capabilities provide the foundation for DLP, access control, and data lifecycle management policies without requiring third-party tools.
Varonis provides automated data classification purpose-built for discovering and classifying sensitive information in unstructured data environments — file shares, NAS, SharePoint, Exchange, and cloud repositories. The platform combines over 400 built-in classification patterns with behavioural analytics that understand who accesses data, how they use it, and whether access patterns represent risk. Varonis excels at answering the fundamental question every security team faces: where is our sensitive data, who has access to it, and is that access appropriate?
This page receives targeted organic traffic from decision-makers actively evaluating data classification software. Secure the final vendor position before it closes.
Claim This PositionA step-by-step framework for deploying data classification software including repository prioritisation, policy design, and DLP integration planning.
Select all that apply to your organisation. We'll recommend which type of solution fits your needs.
Staff use ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini or similar AI assistants for work tasks
Core business runs on Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Slack, or similar SaaS
Subject to GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOX, or other data protection regulations
Employees work from multiple locations, devices, and networks
Organisation handles proprietary source code, trade secrets, or R&D data
Onboarding new tools, employees, and systems faster than security can keep up
Organisation has experienced a data breach, leak, or near-miss in the past 24 months
Currently relying on manual policies or basic security tools without dedicated DLP
An independent comparison of capabilities across the leading data classification tools to help IT teams choose the right foundation for their data protection strategy.
| Capability | Microsoft Purview Information Protection | Varonis Data Security Platform | Your Solution? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automated Discovery | ✅ M365 Native | ✅ All Repositories | — |
| Sensitivity Labelling | ✅ Persistent Labels | ✅ Tag-Based | — |
| Unstructured Data | 🔶 M365 Focused | ✅ Primary Strength | — |
| DLP Integration | ✅ Purview DLP | ✅ Multiple DLP Vendors | — |
| Custom Classifiers | ✅ Trainable | ✅ Pattern + Behavioural | — |
| Access Analytics | 🔶 Basic | ✅ Advanced UEBA | — |
| Multi-Cloud Support | 🔶 Azure-First | ✅ AWS, Azure, GCP | — |
| Regulatory Templates | ✅ 300+ Assessments | ✅ Pre-Built Patterns | — |
| Free Trial | ✅ E3/E5 Included | 🔶 Demo Only | — |
Eighty percent of corporate data is unclassified. That means 80% of your sensitive information has no protection policy, no access control, and no compliance coverage.
Data classification is the prerequisite for effective DLP, access control, compliance reporting, and data governance. Without classification, every downstream security function operates blind — protecting some data while missing the rest.
Enterprise data volumes are growing 25% annually. Manual classification cannot scale. Automated classification software discovers and labels sensitive data at the speed your organisation creates it.
GDPR Article 30 requires organisations to maintain records of processing activities — which begins with knowing what personal data exists and where. Classification provides the data inventory regulators expect to see during audits.
Organisations with accurate data classification experience 60-80% fewer DLP false positives. Classification tells DLP exactly what to look for, eliminating the noisy broad-pattern matching that creates alert fatigue and analyst burnout.
Data classification is the foundational capability that every other data protection function depends on. DLP policies can only enforce rules on data that has been identified and categorised. Access controls are only effective when they are applied based on data sensitivity. Compliance reporting only works when regulated data types are properly tagged. Organisations that deploy DLP without first implementing classification are building on sand — creating policies that either catch too little because they don't know what to look for, or too much because they haven't distinguished sensitive from non-sensitive data.
You can't protect what you can't find, and you can't find what you haven't classified. Data classification is the foundation of every data protection capability — deploy it first, tune it second, then build DLP on top.
Manual data classification — requiring users to apply sensitivity labels to every document they create — suffers from inconsistent application, user fatigue, and misclassification. Automated classification uses pattern recognition, machine learning, and contextual analysis to discover and label sensitive data without human intervention. The best approaches combine automated discovery for bulk historical data with real-time classification at the point of creation, supplemented by user-applied labels for context that only the document creator understands.
Evaluate data classification software on two dimensions: coverage and accuracy. Coverage refers to the breadth of repositories the tool can scan — file servers, NAS devices, SharePoint, cloud storage, email, databases, and SaaS applications. Accuracy refers to the precision of classification decisions, measured by true positive rates, false positive rates, and the tool's ability to handle nuanced data types beyond standard PII patterns. The best tools combine regex patterns, exact data matching, and machine learning to achieve high accuracy across diverse data types.
Test classification accuracy against YOUR data, not vendor sample sets. Request a proof-of-concept that scans your actual repositories. Classification software that achieves 95% accuracy on vendor test data may drop to 70% on your organisation's specific document types and naming conventions.
Data classification software must integrate seamlessly with your DLP solution, access management system, and security operations tools. Classification tags should flow automatically to DLP policies, triggering appropriate protection actions based on sensitivity level. Evaluate the depth of integration — not just whether the tools connect, but whether classification context is used to improve DLP policy precision and reduce false positives.
Choose classification software from the same vendor as your DLP platform when possible. Native integration eliminates the translation layer between classification tags and DLP policies, reducing both deployment complexity and the risk of classification-policy misalignment.
This page receives targeted organic traffic from IT decision-makers actively comparing data classification software. Only three vendor positions are available — once filled, the page is closed to new listings.
Apply for a PositionDataClassificationSoftware.com maintains strict editorial independence. Vendor listings are based on product capability, market positioning, verified user ratings, and independent assessment — not payment. Featured positions involve commercial partnerships, but editorial content and ratings are never influenced by vendor relationships.
Ratings sourced from G2, Gartner Peer Insights, and verified customer reviews. Market data from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024, Gartner, and Statista. This page is reviewed and updated monthly.